Research Guides: Generative AI: Resources for Instructors: Creating Rubrics

Creating Rubrics

ChatGPT can be helpful in constructing a rubric for assessment.

Prompt: Based off the presentation assignment, create a rubric worth a total of 25 points.

Content and Analysis (20)

Thorough Analysis and Comparison of Theories and Media Representations (15 points):

Depth of Understanding (5 points)

Demonstrates a comprehensive and nuanced understanding of at least three social psychology theories related to social identity, intergroup relations, or social perception.

Grasps the complexities and subtleties of the theories, including their origins, key concepts, proponents, and applications.

Comparative Analysis (5 points):

Effectively compares and contrasts the chosen social psychology theories, highlighting their similarities, differences, and strengths and weaknesses.

Identifies and explains the underlying assumptions, methodologies, and limitations of each theory.

Media Analysis (5 points):

Provides a detailed and insightful analysis of how the selected media portrays or misrepresents the social psychology theories.

Uncovers both accurate and inaccurate representations of the theories in the media content.

Explains how media representations influence public perception and understanding of social psychology concepts.

Identification of Strengths, Weaknesses, and Misconceptions (5 points)

Strengths and Weaknesses (3 points)

Clearly identifies and explains the strengths and weaknesses of the chosen social psychology theories in understanding social behavior and phenomena.

Discusses the theoretical contributions and limitations of each theory.

Misconceptions and Misrepresentations (2 points)

Identifies and critically analyzes misconceptions, inaccuracies, or stereotypes related to the social psychology theories as portrayed in the media content.

Challenges harmful stereotypes and promotes accurate understanding of social psychological concepts.

Clarity and Delivery (3)

Presentation Style and Organization (2 points)

Employs a clear, concise, and engaging presentation style that effectively conveys the information.

Presents ideas in a logical and well-organized manner, with a clear introduction, body, and conclusion.

Visual Aids and Engagement (1 point)

Utilizes effective visuals (slides, images, videos) to support the presentation and enhance understanding.

Engages the audience through compelling visuals, interactive elements, and audience participation strategies.

Critical Analysis and Recommendations (2)

Media Influence and Societal Impact (1 point)

Provides a thoughtful and insightful analysis of how media representations of social psychology concepts influence public perception and understanding.

Considers the broader societal implications of media portrayal of social psychological phenomena.

Corrective Suggestions and Improvement Strategies (1 point)

Offers relevant, feasible, and well-reasoned suggestions for improving media portrayals of social psychology concepts.

Proposes concrete actions that can be taken to correct misconceptions and promote accurate understanding.

Total Points: 25

If one AI tool is not generating a desirable assignment or rubric, you can always try switching to another AI tool and compare the differences between the two. Just remember to make sure there is still alignment between the learning objectives, assignments, and rubrics. Start by copying and pasting the assignment generated by the old AI tool into the new AI tool. In the example below, I am using Gemini.

Note: Any rubrics generated by AI should be doubled checked to ensure they properly align and assess the assignment. In addition, it is important to note that AI tools like ChatGPT do not always calculate the point total correctly, which means it will have to be corrected manually.

Prompt: Create a detailed analytic rubric worth 25 points and format the rubric as a table.

Google Gemini generated grading rubric for a social psychology presentation assignment

Criteria Excellent (20-25 points) Satisfactory (10-14 points) Satisfactory (10-14 points) Needs Improvement (Below 10 points)

Content Accuracy (12 points) Clearly defines and explains the chosen social psychology concept with supporting references. - Provides a detailed analysis of the chosen media example, accurately describing its portrayal of the concept. - Offers insightful critiques of the media's portrayal, identifying both strengths (realistic aspects) and weaknesses (inaccuracies or misconceptions) Defines the chosen social psychology concept with some clarity. - Analyzes the media example, but may lack detail or accuracy. - Attempts to critique the portrayal, but may lack depth or insight Definition of the social psychology concept is unclear or incomplete. - Analysis of the media example is basic or lacking in detail. - Limited attempt to critique the portrayal. Definition of the social psychology concept is inaccurate or missing. - Analysis of the media example is absent or irrelevant. - No attempt to critique the portrayal.

Presentation Clarity (8 points) Presentation is well-organized and easy to follow with a logical flow. - Uses clear and concise language with effective visuals that enhance understanding (diagrams, clips, screenshots). - Delivers the presentation with confidence and clarity, engaging the audience. Presentation is mostly organized, but may lack a clear flow or transition between points. - Language is generally clear, but may contain some jargon or unclear explanations. - Visuals are somewhat effective, but may not be fully utilized. - Delivers the presentation with some confidence, but may appear nervous or unprepared. Presentation lacks organization and may be difficult to follow. - Language is unclear or confusing, making comprehension difficult. - Visuals are minimal or ineffective. - Delivers the presentation with hesitation or lack of confidence. Presentation is poorly organized and difficult to understand. - Language is unclear or inappropriate. - Visuals are missing or irrelevant. - Delivery is weak or lacking in confidence.

Critical Thinking (5 points) Demonstrates a clear connection between the chosen social psychology concept and the media example. - Effectively explains how the media portrayal might influence the audience's understanding of the concept. - Discusses the importance of critical media analysis in understanding social psychology concepts in a thoughtful and insightful way. Shows some connection between the concept and media example. - Attempts to explain the influence of the portrayal on the audience, but may lack detail. - Discusses the importance of critical media analysis, but may lack depth or strong arguments. Connection between the concept and media example is weak or unclear. - Limited explanation of the portrayal's influence on the audience's understanding. - Discusses the importance of critical media analysis, but the explanation is basic or generic. Connection between the concept and media example is missing. - No explanation of the portrayal's influence on the audience's understanding. - No discussion of the importance of critical media analysis.

Google Gemini generated grading rubric for a social psychology presentation assignment
Criteria	Excellent (20-25 points)	Satisfactory (10-14 points)	Satisfactory (10-14 points)	Needs Improvement (Below 10 points)
Content Accuracy (12 points)	Clearly defines and explains the chosen social psychology concept with supporting references. - Provides a detailed analysis of the chosen media example, accurately describing its portrayal of the concept. - Offers insightful critiques of the media's portrayal, identifying both strengths (realistic aspects) and weaknesses (inaccuracies or misconceptions)	Defines the chosen social psychology concept with some clarity. - Analyzes the media example, but may lack detail or accuracy. - Attempts to critique the portrayal, but may lack depth or insight	Definition of the social psychology concept is unclear or incomplete. - Analysis of the media example is basic or lacking in detail. - Limited attempt to critique the portrayal.	Definition of the social psychology concept is inaccurate or missing. - Analysis of the media example is absent or irrelevant. - No attempt to critique the portrayal.
Presentation Clarity (8 points)	Presentation is well-organized and easy to follow with a logical flow. - Uses clear and concise language with effective visuals that enhance understanding (diagrams, clips, screenshots). - Delivers the presentation with confidence and clarity, engaging the audience.	Presentation is mostly organized, but may lack a clear flow or transition between points. - Language is generally clear, but may contain some jargon or unclear explanations. - Visuals are somewhat effective, but may not be fully utilized. - Delivers the presentation with some confidence, but may appear nervous or unprepared.	Presentation lacks organization and may be difficult to follow. - Language is unclear or confusing, making comprehension difficult. - Visuals are minimal or ineffective. - Delivers the presentation with hesitation or lack of confidence.	Presentation is poorly organized and difficult to understand. - Language is unclear or inappropriate. - Visuals are missing or irrelevant. - Delivery is weak or lacking in confidence.
Critical Thinking (5 points)	Demonstrates a clear connection between the chosen social psychology concept and the media example. - Effectively explains how the media portrayal might influence the audience's understanding of the concept. - Discusses the importance of critical media analysis in understanding social psychology concepts in a thoughtful and insightful way.	Shows some connection between the concept and media example. - Attempts to explain the influence of the portrayal on the audience, but may lack detail. - Discusses the importance of critical media analysis, but may lack depth or strong arguments.	Connection between the concept and media example is weak or unclear. - Limited explanation of the portrayal's influence on the audience's understanding. - Discusses the importance of critical media analysis, but the explanation is basic or generic.	Connection between the concept and media example is missing. - No explanation of the portrayal's influence on the audience's understanding. - No discussion of the importance of critical media analysis.

Continue editing the rubric until it properly aligns with your assignment and learning objectives. Editing could include changing point totals, adding or removing criteria, or altering the wording of the assessment areas. For instance, the above rubric includes concept definition, supporting references, and analysis within content accuracy as one criteria, but you may wish to separate analysis into its own criteria.

Note: Do not rely on the AI tool alone. It is important to double check all aspects of the work generated by the AI tool throughout assignment creation.